Last night I had the opportunity to discuss nuclear weapons with an experienced, high-ranking security analyst who has been both a military, a scholar, an assistant secretary of defence, presidential adviser, a corporate man and now a think tank member, Lawrence J. Korb.
We were discussing the issues touched upon in this and this article.
I would assume that the debate – facilitated by Iran’s PressTV in an excellent manner – is illustrative of the degree to which the world can be seen from different perspectives and how different we can perceive words such as law, legality, ethics, security, deterrence and peace.
I assume also that the debate illustrates the difference between a systems-embedded interpretation of the world and an independent or free perception, including what can and must be changed and what doesn’t have to change to make the world a better place.
Posted in Atomvåben, Defence and security, Ethics and values, Forsvarspolitik, International affairs, International law, Iran talks, Militarism, NATO, Non-proliferation, Nonviolence, Nuclear weapons, Peace, Peace illiteracy, Peace proposals, Russia, Terrorism and fearology, U.S., United States, US empire, War on Terror
Tagged Ash Carter, Lawrence Korb, No First Use, PressTV
In an open letter – hardly mentioned by the Western mainstream press, a group of high-level and rather “Realpolitik” US diplomats, scholars, military and politicians urge President Obama to take concrete steps to intensify the co-operation with Iran.
There are obviously concerned that the U.S. shall be perceived as an obstacles for the implementation of the JCPOA, or the Iran Nuclear Deal that, on Thursday the 14th, turns one year.
I argue here why I think it is very important that the U.S. moves ahead, one because it was a good deal under the circumstances and, secondly, because it could have absolutely terrible consequences if the deal and its provisions are not honoured – both in Iran, for the Middle East and for the credibility and honour of the US and the rest of the West.
Here my comments on Iran’s international channel, PressTV:
Posted in Defence and security, International affairs, Iran, Iran nuclear deal, Iran talks, Media criticism, Middle East, Negotiations, Non-proliferation, Nonviolence, Nuclear weapons, Peace proposals, United Nations, United States, US empire
Er public service og fri presse = frihed til at være så propagandistisk som man lyster?
DR2 udsendte fredag den 26. februar 2016 kl 00:15 en time-langt fransk dokumentarfilm”Iran – “Iran – A-Bombe for enhver pris.” Fra 2011!
Underteksten: “Et af Vestens vigtigste forsvarsmål lige nu er at sætte en stopper for Irans atomprogram, og…”
Man må spørge i hvilken verden DR2’s programredaktører befinder sig.
Et 5 år gammelt program, der naturligvis intet siger om den atomaftale, Iran indgik i 2015.
Et program, der er tendentiøst, foreholder seerne visse vigtige fakta og farer med usandhed på flere punkter samt benytter tvivlsomme kilder; et program som er markant pro-vestligt, pro-israelsk (det afsluttes med en sekvens om det truede Israel) og i hvilket kun én iransk ekspert – i eksil i USA – kommer til orde.
Ingen der så dette program kunne få andet indtryk end at Iran er et gennemkriminelt land, der som det hedder i den direkte løgnagtige filmtitel for enhver pris ville have et atomvåben.
Intet om alt det, der kunne tale imod at dette var et våbenprogram. Ingen interview med en anerkendt ekspert og forfatter som f.eks. Gareth Porter – intet om andre landes atomvåben etc.
Filmen igennem gøres der ikke forskel på atomprogram (til energiformål) og atomvåbenprogram.
Og det er velkendt at Frankrig har modarbejdet Iran på dette område og repræsenterede Israels interesser ved de forhandlinger, der afsluttedes sidste år.
Posted in Atomvåben, Danmark, Dansk udenrigspolitik, Freedom of expression, Internationalt iøvrigt, Iran, Iran nuclear deal, Iran talks, Mediekritik, Mellemøsten, Militarisme, NATO, Non-proliferation, Terrorism and fearology, Tidsånden, US empire
Tagged anti-Iran propaganda, DR2, Iran - A Bomb At Any Cost, public service, slanted media
15 minutes about this piece of world history. With TFF I am proud that we have been engaged over the last few years in and with Iran and have gathered a reasonable expertise through studies and visits.
Grateful for your sharing if you like it.
Kindly chosen this morning to be the first commentator on RT – the world’s third largest after CNN and Al Jazeera with an estimated 700 million audience:
I’d be happy if you share it!
Posted in Iran, Iran nuclear deal, Iran talks, Nuclear weapons, Sanctions
Tagged Iran, Iran nuclear deal, Javad Zarif, John Kerry, Russia Today interview, US congress, USA
With the breaking news on the nuclear deal announced today – undoubtedly a piece of world history – I wrote up TFF PressInfo # 329 with the above title. It’s written, as others before it on this issue, with an emphasis on the characteristics of this conflict that is both obvious and never mentioned: the a-symmetry of it all, the de factor relations and the negotiation set-up. Therefore, it is a huge victory for the Iran negotiation team under its extremely able leader, Javad Zarif.
Posted in Atomvåben, EU, Iran, Iran talks, Mellemøsten, Middle East, Sanctions, US empire
Tagged Atomvåben, Iran, Iran nuclear deal, Javad Zarif
My comments to Iran’s PressTV in the morning of July 14, before the nuclear deal with Iran was announced. This is a taped interview with a summary text:
“This is a triumph for talks, for diplomacy, for dialogue instead of warfare and it is an important movement for the world not only for Iran or for the Middle East, or for Europe, it is for the whole world, because a war with Iran would be a terrible thing for the people, for the Middle East, for the world,” Jan Oberg, director at Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, told Press TV on Tuesday.
“This is a victory for civilization, for civilized manners,” he added.
Posted in Atomvåben, Iran, Iran talks, Middle East, Negotiations, Nuclear weapons, Sanctions, US empire
Tagged Iran nuclear deal, Israel, Javad Zarif, Netanyahu