Last night I had the opportunity to discuss nuclear weapons with an experienced,  high-ranking security analyst who has been both a military, a scholar, an assistant secretary of defence, presidential adviser, a corporate man and now a think tank member, Lawrence J. Korb.

We were discussing the issues touched upon in this and this article.

I would assume that the debate – facilitated by Iran’s PressTV in an excellent manner – is illustrative of the degree to which the world can be seen from different perspectives and how different we can perceive words such as law, legality, ethics, security, deterrence and peace.

I assume also that the debate illustrates the difference between a systems-embedded interpretation of the world and an independent or free perception, including what can and must be changed and what doesn’t have to change to make the world a better place.

Enjoy!

Interesting too?  Frank Gehry - is there one politician somewhere with a similar creativity

JO

Welcome to my official personal home. I'm a peace researcher and art photographer.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Story

Dagens DR kalkun…

Next Story

On Syria: Change the Russia-NATO discourse

Latest from Atomvåben

Nej till NATO!

“Nej till NATO” är en svensk folkrörelse, som du bör känna till om du har det

Discover more from 🗝 Jan Oberg

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading