My deeply concerned wake-up call to YOU! Please share and spread further!
NATO’s military leader is like a man given a scalpel to perform surgery without ever having opened a book on medicine.
Taxpayers pay for getting less and less secure and risking war in Europe. These military elites have no democratic mandate – be it in the West, Russia, China or anywhere.
My interview with RT International
Militarism, taxpayer money for war planning and lack of democracy
Related Posts
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Latest from AtomvÄben
1056 – KĂŠrnevĂ„ben, Sveriges statsminister, Frank Zappa og mig
Det er bestemt ikke for at vÊre uhÞflig, men nÄr statsminister Ulf Kristersson taler om behovet for atomvÄben, folder hÊnderne pÄ den dér prÊstelignende
Er en nuklear smÄstat mulig? Og hvor er Danmark pÄ vej hen?
Claus Kold – freds- og sikkerhedspolitisk forsker, TFF-Associeret og ven gennem snart 40 Ă„r Mette Frederiksens nylige udtalelser ved sikkerhedskonferencen i MĂŒnchen og hendes
1055 – Ved du at Danmark i FN – pĂ„ dine vegne – stĂžtter grove krigsforbrydelse?
Danmarks FN-ambassadĂžr, regeringen og Udenrigsministeriet burde skamme sig over denne tale i FN’s sikkerhedsrĂ„d, der kun fordĂžmmer Iran og end ikke nĂŠvner USraels angreb
1007 – Det NATO-korrekta Sveriges public service: AnvĂ€ndning av kĂ€rnvapen Ă€r “sannolikt” ett krigsbrott! â?
I NATO-landet Sverige fĂ„r public service SVT uppenbarligen inte kritisera USA/NATO/kĂ€rnvapnen âHur annars förklara denna horribla artikel o intervju pĂ„ 80-Ă„rsdagen för Hiroshima? https://www.svt.se/kultur/var-usas-atombombningar-ett-krigsbrott
This TRUTH About NATO Will Blow Your Mind. Only Argument You Need.
“Dr Oberg completely obliterates both NATO and the Collective West war-deranged hypocrisy.” And then it went viral… Within just 12 hours on Pascal Lottaz’s
Jan,
Wonder if a proposal on Crimea could hold potential for resolving tensions. The Gorbachev-Bush verbal agreement “no NATO expansion, not one inch to the East” has become common knowledge. It seems clear Crimea returned to the Russian Federation mainly because of the centuries old, only warm water naval base there, in other words for geostrategic reasons. If Russia proposed some form of compromise on Crimea with Kiev, but in contrast to the verbal agreement between Gorbachev and Bush I – in 2015 based on a signed treaty guaranteeing permanent status for the Russian navy base in Sevastopol, the true, or major, root of the Ukraine conflict could be comprehensively addressed. Poroshenko’s recent remarks make clear Crimea status, differing narratives aside, remains a significant threat to peace. Such a plan may or may not hold promise for prevention of Crimea-generated war, but because it came to mind and seemed rational, the concept is being shared here. If indeed such a peace concept/proposal held the logical power to prevent the outbreak of war over Crimea, and was not offered then war broke out over Crimea, one would live the rest of one’s life with extreme regret.
Thanks,
Jerry