Burundi’s crisis: Complacency, inaction or racism – or all of it?
There is no end, it seems, to diplomats and government representatives who “express concern”, appeal, urge the parties to show restraint, warn, condemn etc. All words, no deeds.
European leaders reaction is basically silence – while 16 Europeans killed in the office of Charlie Hebdo made them walk arms in arm in Paris.
When I think of Burundi today, all these words by Martin Luther King, Jr on complacency and inaction fit the international so-called community.
There never was a truly human concern behind all the interventions in oil-rich, or otherwise strategically important, countries.
If the Responsibility to Protect meant anything but self-interested, geopolitical interventionism, governments and diplomats would stop talking and wringing their hands now and get their planning tools in place – with the aim to save every Burundian, the region and the world from yet another – preventable – catastrophe.
If Burundi’s crisis had happened in or closer to Europe, would European leaders not have reacted?
If your answer is “I think so” then we are talking about structural racism – whether intended or not, whether conscious or not. It means a system of thought, or a paradigm, embedded in our culture that builds on the tacit, collective assumption that black people are unworthy of the concern, compassion and solidarity that we automatically apply – indeed find natural to apply – to white people in crisis.