A couple of weeks back, I was invited to the London-based “Kalimahorra” (“Free Words”) program at the independent Arab satellite news channel, Al-Mayadeen, which operates out of Beirut, Lebanon.

George Galloway leads a discussion about Danish-Swedish Islamophobic activist and lawyer Rasmus Paludan, burning a Quaran in Stockholm – touching upon freedom of speech, sacredness, human rights, racism, security politics, and more. I was one of two presenters to stimulate the discussion that followed in the studio.

I was happy to be given this opportunity, and you can now watch the event on TFF’s Video Channel on Vimeo – where, by the way, there is so much other news and views for those who rather watch than read…

Interesting too?  Like we use Islamism - why not USism

JO

Welcome to my official personal home. I'm a peace researcher and art photographer.

2 Comments

  1. Good conversation based on traditional values. it carries fruit. “Doual Sobeti” ( difficult to hear precisely ) the female engineer, has important points, the final one being that a wide spectrum of centralized maneged social engineering has a specific endgoal : to offend the majority, the normal people in general, by exposing a wide spectrum of minorities fusioned with retorically driven postulates of universal/ideological/moral/ethics “fashion”, to construct an artificial and polarized argument, which leaves people of other opinion with “one choice”
    ( = zero choice ): either you accept the “premise” – or you are forced to reprecent “the opposite” – no space left for diversity of any kind.

    “the tyrant above” has learned to abuse the minorities to impose his will through a opsition as “the tyrant from below”.

  2. Good conversation based on traditional values, which carries fruit.

    “Doual Sobeti” ( difficult to hear/spell precisely ), the female engineer, has many important points, the final one being that a wide spectrum of centralized managed social engineering has a specific endgoal :

    to control the majority through a sophisticated system of “subversive projected offences by proxy”, by media-overexposed minorities fusioned with retorically driven postulates of universal/ideological/moral/ethical “fashion”, to construct an artificial and polarized argument, which leaves people of different opinion with only “one choice” ( = no choice ):

    either you accept the premises – or you are forced to represent the opposite – we hold the properties of “good/right”, you can either join us, or represent the opposite, “bad/wrong”

    – no space left for different oppinions of any kind.

    “the tyrant above” – easy to recognize – has learned to hide behind the minorities and impose his will through the position as “the tyrant from below” – difficult to recognize – because the people in a given minority takes the subject personally ( naturally ) while they at the same time represent and serve the tyrant, maybe not realizing it.

    Thats how the masses are controlled very efficiently.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Story

En medieekspert om internationale spørgsmål skal opfylde to kriterier

Next Story

Finland joins NATO

Latest from Ethics and values

On entering 2023

In case you expect a kind of celebrative champagne toast-like text here, my apology at the

%d